Fyndin frétt

Fyrir nokkrum dögum birti Laukurinn "viđtal" viđ Apollo geimfarann Neil Armstrong ţar sem hann tjáđi blađamönnum Lauksins ađ samsćrissinni hafi sannfćrt sig um ađ tungllendingin hefđi aldrei átt sér stađ. Ţetta viđtal er hin mesta snilld. Í viđtalinu "segir" Neil:

"It only took a few hastily written paragraphs published by this passionate denier of mankind's so-called 'greatest technological achievement' for me to realize I had been living a lie, " said a visibly emotional Armstrong, addressing reporters at his home. "It has become painfully clear to me that on July 20, 1969, the Lunar Module under the control of my crew did not in fact travel 250,000 miles over eight days, touch down on the moon, and perform various experiments, ushering in a new era for humanity. Instead, the entire thing was filmed on a soundstage, most likely in New Mexico."

"This is the only logical interpretation of the numerous inconsistencies in the grainy, 40-year-old footage," Armstrong added.

Mér fannst ţetta samt best,

He also admitted feeling "ashamed" that he had failed to notice the rippling of the American flag he and Buzz Aldrin planted on the surface, blaming his lack of awareness on the bulkiness of the spacesuit and his excitement about traveling to the "moon."

"That rippling is not possible in the vacuum of space," Armstrong said. "It must have been the wind from an air-conditioning duct that I didn't recognize because you can't hear a damn thing inside those helmets."

"This is all just common sense, people," he added. "It's the moon. You can't land on the moon."

[....]

"Yes, at the time I thought those thousands of NASA employees were working round the clock for the same incredible goal, but if anyone would know what was really going on, it would be Ralph Coleman," Armstrong said of the 31-year-old part-time librarian's assistant. "He knows a lot more about faked moon landings than I ever could. He's been researching the subject on the Internet for years."

"Literally years," he added.

Ţetta er einfaldlega bestu rök gegn tungllendingarsamsćrisbullinu sem ég hef heyrt hingađ til. Sýnir fáránleikann vel. 

Ţessi frétt BBC er samt eiginlega kostulegri en upphaflega "frétt" Lauksins. Einhver tvö dagblöđ í Bangladess héldu viđtaliđ vćri raunverulegt og birtu raunverulega frétt um ţađ! 


« Síđasta fćrsla | Nćsta fćrsla »

Athugasemdir

1 Smámynd: Jón Stefánsson

Góđur! :)

Jón Stefánsson, 4.9.2009 kl. 11:42

2 Smámynd: Arnar

Eđal fréttamennska í Bangladess, og ég sem hélt ađ ţađ vćru bara íslenskir fréttahaukar sem ţýddu (oftast illa) greinar af netinu.

Arnar, 4.9.2009 kl. 12:01

3 Smámynd: Ágúst H Bjarnason

Ţetta var alveg örugglega laukrétt  frétt.

Ágúst H Bjarnason, 4.9.2009 kl. 19:38

Bćta viđ athugasemd

Ekki er lengur hćgt ađ skrifa athugasemdir viđ fćrsluna, ţar sem tímamörk á athugasemdir eru liđin.

Innskráning

Ath. Vinsamlegast kveikiđ á Javascript til ađ hefja innskráningu.

Hafđu samband